|
The Compassionate Carnivore: Or, How to Keep Animals Happy, Save Old MacDonald's Farm, Reduce Your Hoofprint, and Still Eat Meat | 
enlarge | Author: Catherine Friend Publisher: Da Capo Press Category: Book
List Price: $24.00 Buy New: $7.70 You Save: $16.30 (68%)
New (41) Used (12) from $7.70
Avg. Customer Rating: 11 reviews Sales Rank: 346059
Media: Hardcover Edition: 1st Da Capo Press Ed Number Of Items: 1 Pages: 291 Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.9 Dimensions (in): 8.3 x 5.7 x 1.2
ISBN: 1600940072 Dewey Decimal Number: 641.36 EAN: 9781600940071 ASIN: 1600940072
Publication Date: April 21, 2008 Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days Condition: hardcover book and dust jacket in excellent condition-fast ship
|
| Also Available In:
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
For most of her life, Catherine Friend was a carnivore who preferred not to consider where the meat on her plate came from—beef didn’t have a face, chicken didn’t have a personality, and pork certainly shouldn’t have feelings. But Friend’s attitude began to change after she and her partner bought a farm and began raising sheep for meat. Friend’s ensuing odyssey through the world of livestock and farming is a journey that offers critical insights—for omnivores and herbivores alike—into how our meat is raised, how we buy it and from whom, and why change is desirable and possible. From a distressing lesson about her favorite Minnesota State Fair food (pork-chop-on-a-stick) to the surprising gratitude that came from eating an animal she’d raised and loved, Friend takes us on a wild and woolly ride through her small farm (with several brief detours into life on factory farms), along the way raising questions such as: What are the differences between factory, conventional, sustainable, and organic farms, and more importantly, why do we need to understand those differences? What do all those labels—from organic to local to grass fed and pasture raised—really mean? If you’re buying from a small farmer, what are the key questions to ask? How do you find that small farmer, and what’s the best way to help her help you? In the same witty and warm style that characterized her memoir Hit by a Farm, Friend uses her perspective as a sustainable farmer and carnivore to consider meat animals’ quality of life—while still supporting the choice to eat meat. Regardless of whether you eat meat once a day, once a week, or once a year, your perspective of what goes on your plate—and in your mouth—will never be the same.
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 6 more reviews...
A great read about responsible eating October 2, 2008 1 out of 1 found this review helpful
I have read just about everything out there on local and responsible eating, and had been a fan of Ms. Friend's ever since reading Hit By a Farm. I was thrilled to see she had a new book out, and was anxious to get my hands on it. I have since purchased a bunch of copies for friends and have discussed it with everyone from my CSA farmer to my local butcher to my vegan friends. As a former vegetarian and as a person who cares deeply about where my food comes from, I can't recommend a more articulate and well-written discussion. I highly recommend this book to anyone who wants to take responsibility for the food they eat.
Hitting the nail on the head. October 1, 2008 3 out of 3 found this review helpful
In writing The Compassionate Carnivore, Catherine Friend strikes a balance between the extremes of unwittingly eating factory meat, and not eating meat at all. It's refreshing to have described to you a level headed point of view that offers viable solutions to a problem that's largely ignored in our society today. I loved the non-accusatory manner in which Friend gently urges, not a sea change for every American's diet, but a simple tweaking in order to slowly begin a shift away from our current non-sustainable system of animal husbandry. Also deserving of praise are the numerous quotations from other texts written by experts on agriculture. If you have a lot of time on your hands, read every book you can find on this subject. If you don't, look no further than The Compassionate Carnivore.
The Delusional Carnivore September 26, 2008 1 out of 7 found this review helpful
Catherine Friend likes the taste of the flesh of animals and isn't about to stop eating animal flesh, menstrual secretions or milk. That's the most honest thing she says, and the rest of the book is the mental acrobatics necessary to make it acceptable to slaughter animals and call it compassion.
I'm sure it's true that small farms are better for the environment than factory farms, so I have no argument with that. But the compassion part is patently absurd and also creepy. Friend claims to "love" the animals, whom she knows (because she's done her research and she also has experienced this) that the animals have individual personalities and experience emotions and are far more intelligent than we give them credit for. Yet she has no problem betraying them by taking them to their slaughter. Perhaps the most chilling part is the "Letter to My Lambs," wherein she claims to be honoring the lives of the sentient beings she's about to kill (actually, have killed).
What Friend fails to understand is that the animals want one crucial thing she'll never allow: a reprieve from slaughter.
Animals don't care what we say; they care what we do. Talk of love and respect is empty if it's purpose is to produce tasty flesh (and there's a chapter about the taste of flesh that basically says that she treats the animals the way she does because that makes them taste better).
Finally, to say that staying "at the table" with animal exploiters and abusers is better for animals than leaving the table is absurd. If you want to reduce the use and suffering of animals, you make the choice to not use them and you support companies that have the same values. There are plenty of them.
Friend insults vegans, as well as sentient nonhumans, by claiming that eating animals can ever help them.
Mary Martin, Ph.D. (in Applied Linguistics from New York University, for all those who might be compelled to question my education or its relevance)
[...]
Insightful read! August 5, 2008 4 out of 4 found this review helpful
I was a meat-eater, then went to a ranch where I helped with the birthing of baby lambs (which were so sweet and innocent) and immediately gave up meat... for a year. After 12 long months of meat-free meals, I caved in -my body really craved the protein you can really only find in animal meat, so now I'm trying to find a happy balance between being a vegetarian and being a "compassionate carnivore". This book really gives great insight into finding that balance - a great read for anyone who struggles with the decision to eat, or not to eat meat.
Compassionate carnivore is no Friend of animals July 29, 2008 4 out of 11 found this review helpful
In "Compassionate Carnivore," Catherine Friend offers an appalling Orwellean misrepresentation of compassion. The definition of compassion includes "a feeling of deep sympathy for another's suffering." How can Friend (or any would-be "compassionate carnivore") seriously claim to be deeply sympathetic with an animal's suffering while acting as the cause and perpetrator of that suffering? Friend's book title includes the phrase, "keep animals happy." How happy are these animals as they are suspended by their hoofs and have their throats slit?
The word "humane" tossed in many times by Friend. Humane means to act with "tenderness, compassion and sympathy for ... animals." How tender is the edge of the meat processor's knife? How compassionate is the theft of a veal calf from the nurturing utter of his loving mother? How much sympathy is involved in the rape of female animals through artificial insemination?
Friend egregiously claimed that animals are here for one purpose: to feed us. No they are not. Animals, as they think and feel, have purposes of their own. The purpose of a pig is to root for food, make soft beds of dry leaves or straw, and to seek the company of other pigs. The intention of a meat-eating human toward an animal, and the purpose of an animal herself, are two entirely different matters that should not be confused.
Friend excused animal agriculture based on a farmer's drive to be productive with that land. Agricultural productivity does not require killing animals. When farmers begin to look beyond their own fence line and consider the productivity of the land as well as the best interests of society and the planet there will be a turning away from animal production. To excuse slaughter for the sake of profit places Friend in the same ethical basin as Jim Perdue.
Friend asserts that the "lives of the animals are worthy of our consideration." Should she ever express consideration for my life, I'll be certain to cover my throat in fear of the coming assault.
It is a naive false hope that pastured-based farming is possible as a society-wide sustainable solution to increasing food production demands and the environmental devastation caused by livestock. When considered objectively from a standpoint of resources, psuedo-humane meat can never be more than a boutique product for a few elite consumers. It is not a path for true sustainability for a nation of 300 million people or a planet of six billion.
Sincerely, Jim Van Alstine, President Mid-Hudson Vegetarian Society
|
|
|
Copyright 2008 - RailroadBookstore.com
| |