|
The Nature of Photographs | 
enlarge | Author: Stephen Shore Publisher: The Johns Hopkins University Press Category: Book
Buy Used: $90.00
Used (8) Collectible (1) from $90.00
Avg. Customer Rating: 14 reviews Sales Rank: 890437
Media: Paperback Number Of Items: 1 Pages: 104 Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.9 Dimensions (in): 9 x 8 x 0.4
ISBN: 0801857201 Dewey Decimal Number: 770.11 EAN: 9780801857201 ASIN: 0801857201
Publication Date: February 17, 1998 Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days Shipping: Expedited shipping available Shipping: International shipping available Condition: Publisher: Johns Hopkins University Press Date of Publication: 1998 Binding: Soft Cover Edition: 1st Printing Condition: Very Good/ Description: 0801857201 Glossy paper cover, illustrated mainly with b/w photos but a few in color, 86 pages. Attractive copy. Cover has very light shelf wear. Text is clean. Scans available. USPS confirmation used on all shipments.
|
| Also Available In:
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
How does a photograph "work"? In this book, internationally acclaimed photographer Stephen Shore brings together more than fifty images (by such photographers as Walker Evans, Eugène Atget, Robert Adams, Diane Arbus, Frank Gohlke, Lee Friedlander, Edward Weston, Robert Frank, William Eggleston, and Jan Groover) to illustrate a process of looking at and understanding photography. He traces the process by which the world in front of the camera is transformed into a photograph -- and how that photograph, in turn, is transformed into a mental image. A photograph, Shore explains, can be viewed on several levels. First, it is a physical object, a print. On this print is an image, an illusion of a window onto the world. It is at this level that we "read" a picture and discover its content: a souvenir of an exotic land, the face of a lover, a wet rock, a landscape at night. This is the depictive level, in which the world is transformed into a photograph through qualities of flatness, frame, time, and focus. On a final level is the mental apprehension of the image, which joins the focus of lens, eye, attention, and mind. Using these levels of seeing, Shore reveals how the qualities of a photograph create tension and meaning -- as the collapsing of depth creates new relationships, as lines and shapes in the image play against the frame, as focus creates barriers in the depth of an image, as the duration of exposure variously transforms the fluid world into a static piece of film. As the visual image continues to grow in importance as a medium of global communication, the skills and insights conveyed by this book will become increasingly relevant both to those who take photographs and those who view them.
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 9 more reviews...
Short but deep July 14, 2008 In this short essay, Shore manages to communicate some deep truths about photography in a refreshingly clear and accessible style. The arguments are simple, profound and convincing. Together with the photographs, the result is a thought-provoking and almost meditative book. It has become one of my favorites.
You can look but can you see May 5, 2008 3 out of 3 found this review helpful
I've always loved Stephen Shore's work ever since I bought his 'Uncommon Places' book in 1983. It has two of my favorite Shore images: La Brea Avenue & Beverley Boulevard and El Paso Street, El Paso (both taken in 1975) this last one is in The Nature of Photography. A photographer is perhaps the ideal person to tell others about the fundamentals of looking at photos and my appreciation of Shore's work was enough to make me buy the book.
It certainly has some quite stunning photos, especially where they relate to specific text and many thought provoking points come across but I was left with the impression that there should have been more or a different way to explain what there is. The book's photos are a key element in how to understand what is going on and I would have preferred to have seen others that didn't work as obviously as the ones that do. Shore, like any creative photographer, must have taken many images that he doesn't think work as well as the final choice. Seeing some lesser alternatives to the ones in the book would have improved it no end by explaining why photo A reveals a fundamental point beautifully but photo B doesn't. I thought too many visual concepts were put across more by words than images.
Shore says that he used Szarkowski's `The Photographer's Eye' when he started teaching and his book carries on the theme. Overall I still prefer Szarkowski's book, there are far more photos included and the presentation is much more user friendly than the hard edge Phaidon design, with its excessive amounts of empty page space and trendy use of a typewriter font for every bit of text.
Incidentally as both books are concerned with image appreciation and understanding maybe a DVD format would work just as well as these printed versions.
***FOR AN INSIDE LOOK click 'customer images' under the cover.
Did i get the same book? May 5, 2008 2 out of 3 found this review helpful
I read the reviews. I got the book. I read the book. Then I went and reread through the reviews again to see if I had missed the point of what people must have been saying. I'm left wondering if I even have the same book.
First off, this book has great photos magnificently reproduced. I appreciate when an author lets the images speak for themselves and this book had great potential to do just that, seeing that the entire text of the book would scarcely fill a dozen or so 3x5 file cards. Then the author opened his mouth and I was no longer sure what I was looking at. Only about 10% of the text made any sense to me. I do not question his mastery of photography, but I got the feeling I was being talked down to because I didn't have a doctorate in philosophy. I will agree with one reviewer statement that it seemed a bit pretentious. He really needs to work on his communication skills. Education should be used to help others learn, not show off how educated you are.
Personally, I didn't get a lot out of it. Not just because there wasn't a lot in it, but because what little there was seemed to go right over my head. I was left with the possible conclusion that maybe I'm too dumb to be a photographer. A good book should make seemingly complex topics simple, not do what this book does and make the very simple act of looking at a photograph complex.
Worth a look and a read February 26, 2008 This book is in many ways another take on John Szarkowski's The Photographer's Eye, as Shore notes. This is not a bad thing. It is really quite straightforward and, so far as it goes, worth a read. Actually I've read it twice. (It doesn't take long.) The interplay between photos and text is generally effective, the selections are generally helpful, and the image quality quite good (especially for the price). Maybe I should have given it five stars; it's very good in its own way. However, it does rather show the limits of text for understanding photographs and the attention to the individual images is not, and is not meant to be, very developed.
Very good. A must for people who want more from photography. December 18, 2007 Even though more explanations on the pictures would have been helpful, the little that is written opens the reader's mind to think differently and see more in photographs, wether we just look at them or are about to take them ourselves. The pictures themselves are very inspirational. I loved it, and recommend it to anyone who isn't interested in photography on the shallow level of "pictures that look good" only.
|
|
|
Copyright 2008 - RailroadBookstore.com
| |