|
| 
enlarge | Author: Stephen E. Ambrose Publisher: Simon & Schuster Category: Book
List Price: $17.00 Buy Used: $0.01 You Save: $16.99 (100%)
New (40) Used (194) Collectible (9) from $0.01
Avg. Customer Rating: 214 reviews Sales Rank: 46683
Media: Paperback Number Of Items: 1 Pages: 432 Shipping Weight (lbs): 1.4 Dimensions (in): 9.3 x 6.1 x 1.3
ISBN: 0743203178 Dewey Decimal Number: 385.0973 EAN: 9780743203173 ASIN: 0743203178
Publication Date: November 6, 2001 Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days Shipping: Expedited shipping available Shipping: International shipping available Condition: aged pages, worn cover
|
| Customer Reviews:
MISTAKES January 31, 2004 5 out of 10 found this review helpful
THIS IS A SUBJECT I AM VERY FAMILIAR WITH AND ALTHOUGH THE AUTHORS INTENT TO PRESENT THE HISTORY OF THE TRANSCONTINTAL RAILROAD FROM THE POINT OF VIEW OF THE WORKING MAN IS GOOD, THE EXTREME NUMBER OF TECHNICAL AND HISTORIC MISTAKES MAKE THIS BOOK ALMOST WORTHLESS.
A great and enduring story, poorly told and misinterpreted January 21, 2004 6 out of 11 found this review helpful
This book begins and ends with grand statements about the "vision" of government supremacists like Abraham Lincoln and various members of Congress. Ambrose repeats many of the most enduring myths of the railroad baron era, and tells this story in a very conventional way. The great "foreward-thinking" "leaders" in Washington who planned and commissioned the first transcontinental railroad as a marriage of government and private enterprise are painted as heroes, while those who criticized this monstrous government giveaway are depicted as narrow-minded reactionaries.In fact, Ambrose ignores a good bit of evidence that suggests that government subsidies of the transcontinental railroads was entirely unnecessary and probably detrimental to the industry. Burton W. Folsom, Jr., in the book "The Myth of the Robber Barons" shows that it was possible to build transcontinental lines without government subsidies. Ambrose deals primarily with the Union Pacific and the Central Pacific Railroades, which were both in bed with Washington policymakers. But Folsom describes how James J. Hill's Great Northern Railroad was able to construct a transcontinental line across worse terrain using land purchased on the open market without any government loans or subsidies--and to make a profit while charging lower faires! Thus much of Ambrose' interpretation--his "moral" as it were--is simply false. Government subsidies of the Union Pacific and Central Pacific produced inefficient, corrupt operations that negatively impacted the U.S. railroad industry for generations afterward.
Error filled and quotes from non-existent people October 30, 2003 6 out of 15 found this review helpful
All of Ambrose's works have been severely criticized for their errors and extensive plagiarisms, but this book may lead all of the rest, according to the Committee for the protection of yWhat is Truey in Railroad History, chaired by G.J. yChrisy Graves, Newcastle, California, which found that Ambrose text contains at least 60 pages that display one or more rather obvious errors, as well as quotes from non-existent people. The test itself (at least that part actually written by Ambrose) has his usual bombastic statements and pedestrian writing. Ambrose never let the facts get in the way of a heroic tale. His books qualify for the fiction shelf. They're certainly not histories.
Not a classic but a good read just the same. October 10, 2003 8 out of 9 found this review helpful
Enjoyable, but somewhat repetitive story of the transcontinental railroad. Often narrative gives out and is replaced with lists of statistics or simply fails and is reduced to hyperbolae. Despite this, it was a good telling of the facsinating story behind the train that tied together the american continent. T
over rated September 25, 2003 4 out of 6 found this review helpful
Ambrose has become so popular he thinks he can write anything. The best book on the transcontinental railroad is called 'Empire Express'. This book is just not worth it. Ambrose has produced some valuable scholarship(on Ike and Nixon) but this doesnt pass muster. Not recommended when equal and better volumes exist that are specialities for the authors involved, not just popular history.
|
|
|
Copyright 2008 - RailroadBookstore.com | |